Sunday, January 23, 2022

2022 Reverse Crit


This past Thursday evening, representatives from three AIA Oregon firms presented projects currently in design for scrutiny by University of Oregon architecture students in the 2022 Reverse Crit. Organized by the Oregon chapter of the American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS), the online event attracted a healthy (virtual) turnout comprised of a mix of Department of Architecture students and AIA Oregon members.

The firms who participated this year and the projects they presented were: 

Neuva Esperanza

Neueva Esperanza (presented by Eugenia Fama-Higgins and Amy Cripps of Scott | Edwards Architecture with Paula Barreto of landscape architects PLACE) 

The Ponds

The Ponds (presented by Richard Shugar, AIA, LEED AP of 2fORM Architecture)

The Yakima Valley Transportation Company

The Yakima Valley Transportation (Trolley) Company (presented by Shannon Sardell of 5/4 Architecture, LLC)

The ostensible point of the Reverse Crit was to provide architecture students with the occasion to turn the tables on these AIA Oregon professionals and comment on their real-world projects (as opposed to the usual scenario where it is the students whose work is subject to review and scrutiny); however, as with previous editions of the event, actual analyses or critiques of the projects did not materialize. The notion of a reverse crit appears burdened with unrealistic expectations. Undoubtedly, the students may not have felt it was their place to question the judgment of experienced professionals.

So “Reverse Crit” is a misnomer. Instead, the program was a one-sided pin-up session by the presenters. The students appeared much more comfortable regarding it a learning opportunity rather than a gauntlet thrown down before them by the professional community. There was absolutely nothing wrong in this.

The real value of the program resided in the opportunity to peek behind the curtain to see the inner workings of the projects. All three presentations highlighted the challenges faced by the designers, the multiplicity of their concerns, and how they resolved those issues architecturally. For example, the team at Scott | Edwards Architecture and PLACE are working to design Nueva Esperanza (“New Hope” in Spanish) as an affordable housing development attuned to the specifics of its site in Hillsboro and the diverse population it will be home to. 2fORM Architecture’s (with landscape architects The Satre Group) daunting task is to develop a richly detailed and context-responsive design for The Ponds within the strictures of a previously approved planned unit development (PUD) plan. Shannon Sardell provided a fascinating accounting of 5/4 Architecture’s contributions toward preserving the remnants of the country’s last early 20th-century electric trolley service still in operation today.

All three projects stressed the realities of the real-world design process and the dynamics associated with getting the job done. This latter aspect of the presentations was of particular interest to the students as it provided insight into how “book learning” translates to professional practice. Real clients and genuine issues are in play in all projects architects undertake, so exposure to that aspect of design can be revealing. My sense is the students genuinely valued hearing these skilled practitioners describe how they arrived at their respective design solutions, all while addressing a myriad of practical concerns.

The event concluded with AIAS conferring three awards, as selected by the meeting’s attendees through online voting:

  • Most Sustainable Award: The Yakima Valley Transportation Company
  • Best Contextual Fit Award: The Ponds
  • Most Inclusive Award: Nueva Esperanza


Sponsors for the 2022 Reverse Crit were the University of Oregon College of Design, the Materials Exchange Community Center for Arts (MECCA), Off the Waffle, AIA Oregon, and my firm, Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc.

If we are fortunate enough, next year’s Reverse Crit/Professionals’ Pin-Up will occur in-person so direct interactions with the students are possible. I may have graduated from architecture school decades ago, but I will always remain a student of architecture. At this year’s Reverse Crit, I thoroughly enjoyed learning about how a few of my professional peers are harnessing their skills to produce the best possible results for the clients and communities they serve.

No comments: